Meta’s Monopoly Trial: The Future of Social Media at Stake

Performance Digital • May 12, 2025

The FTC's Case Against Meta

The intense battle between the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Meta over allegations of monopolistic practices has the potential to reshape the landscape of social media and big tech as we know it.


In a move that would later become central to the FTC's case, Meta purchased Instagram for $1 billion in April 2012, followed by WhatsApp for $19 billion. Then, in December 2020, the FTC, in conjunction with 46 states, filed a lawsuit against Meta alleging illegal monopolization. This lawsuit specifically focused on the acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp, arguing that Meta employed a "buy or bury" strategy to eliminate potential competitors. While the initial complaint faced difficulties and was dismissed, an amended complaint was subsequently filed, and the case eventually went to trial in April 2025.

Meta's Defense: Growth, Improvement, and a Changing Landscape

According to Meta, they "...acquired Instagram and WhatsApp to improve and grow them alongside Facebook," the company's attorney Mark Hansen argued. "But the FTC claims that Meta '...They decided that competition was too hard, and it would be easier to buy out their rivals than to compete with them,'" said Federal Trade Commission (FTC) lawyer Daniel Matheson. Basically, like a social network monopoly.  

Since 2011, the social media platforms have changed, and they aren't the same when it comes to posting, sharing, and adding friends. "The amount that people are sharing with friends on Facebook, especially, has been declining," Zuckerberg said. "Even the number of new friends that people add ... I think has been declining. But I don't know the exact numbers." Messaging between individuals or friend groups is becoming more popular than sharing content on more public social media feeds. 


Meta's Competition: YouTube

Although Meta owns Facebook and Instagram, they still face competition, mainly with Google's YouTube. YouTube is popular amongst online content creators/influencers and younger audiences. Pew Research found that nine in 10 US teens use YouTube, while Facebook usage has "steeply declined" over the past decade among that age group. Due to the video type of format and the ability to have longer videos, people can spend more time on YouTube than on Facebook and Instagram combined. 


Zuckerburg's Early Concerns and the Stakes of the Trial

Even before the lawsuit was filed, in 2018 Mark Zuckerberg raised concerns about this and the chance of spinning out Insta and WhatsApp. But Meta didn't end up spinning Instagram or WhatsApp off, and it's now he is in court fighting the FTC to avoid having to do just that. 


In 2012, Zuckerberg appeared to realize that Facebook's now-defunct Facebook Camera service was falling behind Instagram in functionality and popularity."In the time it has taken us to get our act together on this, Instagram has become a large and viable competitor to us on mobile photos, which will increasingly1 be the future of photos,"2 Zuckerberg wrote in an email at the time in 2012. 


Even though YouTube is a threat to Meta, still, Meta holds a firm grip on the social media market, especially in the US, according to Pew Research, where it operates a quarter of the most widely-used social media platforms. As the trial continues, it will be interesting to see how it affects the online space. Especially since there's a lot at stake for Meta, as it could be forced to offload Instagram and WhatsApp if it loses. 


How This Could Impact Digital Marketing

The trial's outcome could reshape digital marketing. If Meta is forced to split up Instagram and WhatsApp, advertisers would most likely lose the ability to run unified campaigns across platforms. This would make audience targeting, data tracking, and content distribution more complex. Marketers may need to diversify faster, relying more on platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and others to maintain reach and results.

Share

A Netflix logo with a white AI on a black background.
By Sydney Burright June 6, 2025
Discover how Netflix is using AI to create smarter, more personalized ads and what this shift means for the future of digital advertising.
A green icon with a bird on it is on a green motherboard.
By Alexis Rios May 27, 2025
Duolingo. The name conjures images of a quirky green owl, playful social media interactions, and the satisfying ding! of a completed lesson. They've built a massive following, not just for their accessible language learning app, but for their undeniably fun, interactive, and often hilariously trendy online presence. But things have taken a sharp turn. Earlier this year, Duolingo's CEO announced a significant shift in the company's core identity: they are now an AI-first company . For those unfamiliar, being "AI-first" means that an organization prioritizes artificial intelligence as the central driving force behind its business decisions, operations, and the very development of its products and services. AI isn't just a tool; it's the foundation upon which the company is built and innovates. On the surface, the benefits seem clear for the company. It promises increased efficiency and potentially a smoother, more streamlined user experience. However, this strategic pivot hasn't been met with open arms by Duolingo's loyal fanbase. In fact, it's stirred up a considerable amount of anger and disappointment. The core of the issue lies in the perception of authenticity. For a brand that cultivated such a vibrant and human-feeling online persona, the move towards AI-first feels like a cold, calculated decision. It signals to users that the company might prioritize algorithms over people, potentially sacrificing the very elements that made Duolingo so engaging and relatable. The reaction from longtime users has been swift and decisive. Reports are flooding in of individuals ending their hard-earned Duolingo streaks and deleting the app altogether. Others have left snarky remarks on Duolingo’s TikTok page comments . The emotional connection built over months and years of learning alongside the quirky owl now feels… less genuine.